TPP Academy Logo

Raise and Re Raise Preflop

By TPP Academy

COMMON SCENARIOS | LESSON 3

LISTEN TO : COMMON SCENARIOS | LESSON 3

Table of Contents

In online poker games, most of your winrate is decided before the flop. Not because preflop is “sexy”, but because range construction and SPR control decide how easy the rest of the hand is to play. When you raise and face a re raise, you are being asked a simple question, “Is your opening range built to handle pressure, or does it fold too much?”

This is a common scenario, and it is where a lot of players leak EV by doing one of two things. They either overfold because they hate big pots, or they overcontinue because they do not want to be pushed around. Your goal is neither pride nor fear. Your goal is to build a continue strategy that is hard to exploit, then adjust based on villain type, stack depth, and who is left to act.

What “Raise and Re Raise” Really Means

Preflop, a re raise is simply a 3 bet. Once you open, villain’s 3 bet range is usually stronger and more polarized than their flatting range. That one action changes everything. It shifts the hand from “small pot, wide ranges” to “bigger pot, tighter ranges”, and it also changes rake dynamics.

On most online sites, rake in single raised pots is meaningful, and it is often capped. In 3 bet pots, the pot grows fast, so the rake cap is reached quickly, which means your edge matters more than the rake once stacks are deep enough. Still, you should not justify spewy calls with “rake cap”. Use rake as one variable, not your whole personality.

Your First Job: Define the Three Responses

When you open and face a 3 bet, you have exactly three options, and your EV comes from assigning hands correctly.

  • Fold, hands that are dominated, play poorly versus a tight range, or cannot realize equity well when stacks are deep and you are out of position.
  • Call, hands that have decent equity, realize well, and protect your opening range from being auto 3 bet.
  • 4 bet, hands that want to stack off for value, plus a set of bluffs that make villain indifferent to 3 betting too wide.

If your strategy is “I call everything suited” or “I only 4 bet premiums”, you will get bullied by any thinking reg who is multi tabling and watching frequencies. Context dictates strategy, and preflop is where you set the tone.

Position and Who Is Left to Act

Position does not just change postflop playability. It changes what you are allowed to do preflop because it changes equity realization. In position, you can call wider versus a 3 bet because you will realize more of your equity. Out of position, you must be more selective, and you must 4 bet more of the hands that are too strong to fold but too awkward to call.

Now add the most ignored variable by intermediate players, who is left to act. If you open CO and BTN 3 bets, you still have the blinds behind. If you call, you invite a squeeze, and your range becomes capped and squeezed. If you 4 bet, you often clean up the situation and deny the blinds good squeeze conditions. The players behind you are not background noise. They are part of the EV equation.

Sizing Logic in Online Cash Games

Online, standard opens are small, and 3 bet sizing is fairly consistent. You still need a plan.

  • Open sizing, keep it stable. You want your range to be unobservable when multi tabling. Typically 2x to 2.5x is fine.
  • In position 3 bet, often around 3x the open. Example, open 2.5x, 3 bet to 7.5x.
  • Out of position 3 bet, go bigger, often 3.5x to 4.5x. You are compensating for positional disadvantage.
  • 4 bet sizing, keep stacks in mind. In position, you can go smaller, out of position you generally go larger. Your size should set up a clean stack off threshold with your value range.

A common leak is making a tiny 4 bet out of position because you want a call. That is backwards. A tiny 4 bet gives villain a good price to continue and positionally outplay you in a bloated pot. Relative strength is everything, and your sizing should reflect your plan, not your hopes.

Building a Strong Continue Range Versus 3 Bets

Here is the coaching version. You want a continue range that does three things.

  • Does not overfold, if you fold too much, villain prints by 3 betting any two remotely playable hands.
  • Does not overcall, if you call too wide, you end up with dominated hands that get wrecked by value heavy ranges.
  • Has a 4 bet bluff component, not because you love bluffing, but because it prevents villain’s 3 bet range from expanding freely.

Against a solid reg, think in buckets. Value 4 bets, bluff 4 bets, calls. The exact hands depend on positions, but the logic stays stable.

Value 4 bets are hands happy to stack off versus a 5 bet or a shove. Typically QQ+ and AK are your bedrock, then you expand based on villain and position.

Bluff 4 bets are chosen for blockers and playability. Hands like A5s, A4s, K5s can work because they remove strong continues from villain’s range and they still have equity when called.

Calls are often pairs that can continue on many boards, suited broadways with good equity, and suited connectors in the right spots. But I want to be clear. Do not call “to set mine”. That is hope poker. If you cannot explain how your hand realizes equity on a wide set of flops, it probably does not belong in your call range.

Exploit Adjustments Versus Common Online Player Types

GTO gives you a baseline. Exploit is where the money is, especially online where population tendencies are stable.

Versus tight 3 bettors, you fold more, you 4 bet bluff less, and you value 4 bet more linearly. If villain’s 3 bet range is heavily QQ+ and AK, then your calls with dominated broadways bleed. Keep the continue tight and mostly value focused.

Versus loose aggressive 3 bettors, you do the opposite. You defend wider, you add 4 bet bluffs, and you use position to realize equity. If they 3 bet and then overfold to 4 bets, you can print with a well chosen bluff 4 bet range.

Versus unknowns, play solid. Use the position based baseline and watch showdowns. One clean adjustment based on data beats ten emotional adjustments based on vibes.

Common Leaks I See Students Make

  • Calling dominated offsuit broadways out of position. KJo, QJo, ATo. They look “playable”, then you flop second pair and burn money.
  • Only 4 betting premiums. If your 4 bet range is only AA and KK, villain can fold everything else and stop paying you.
  • Random suited connector calls at the wrong depth or position. 87s plays well in some spots, but not as a default “I like suited cards” decision.
  • No plan for 5 bets. If you 4 bet and then panic fold to a shove with a hand that should stack off, your sizing and selection were wrong.

EV Mindset: What Are We Trying to Accomplish?

Every preflop decision should answer one EV question. “Does this action increase my EV versus villain’s range, given stack depth, rake, and positional realization?”

That lens helps you avoid ego battles. Sometimes the highest EV play is folding a hand that feels strong. Sometimes the highest EV play is 4 betting a hand that feels weak. Your job is to make the line that performs best versus the range you actually face, not the range you wish they had.

Hand Scenario: The Blind Pressure Test

Game: 100bb online cash, 6 max. Hero is SB, Villain is BTN, Villain is a thinking reg with an active 3 bet strategy.

Hero Hand: 87

Preflop Action: BTN opens to 2.5bb. SB 3 bets to 10bb. BB folds. BTN calls.

Flop: K96

Flop Action: Hero c bets 6bb into 20.5bb. BTN raises to 18bb.

Here is what I want you to notice. Preflop, the SB 3 bet with 87 is not a “because suited connector” moment. It is a range construction choice. From the SB you cannot profitably flat a lot versus the BTN open because BB can come along or squeeze, and you will be out of position in a raked pot. So you polarize. You 3 bet your top hands for value, and you add bluffs that have good playability and board coverage.

On this flop, you have an open ended straight draw. When you c bet small, your range keeps a lot of strong hands, and you let villain continue with worse. When villain check raises, you do not get emotional. You evaluate. Their raises contain value like K9s, sets, two pair, plus bluffs like QJ, JT, and some backdoor combos.

Your response is driven by stack depth and equity. With an open ender, you have strong semi bluffing potential. Folding is not on the menu. Calling keeps villain’s bluffs in and realizes your equity. Shoving can be viable if villain overfolds, but versus a thinking reg with a strong raising range on this texture, call is often the cleanest line. The key is that the preflop 3 bet created a spot where your bluffs have enough equity to fight back, instead of passively bleeding in a single raised pot from the blinds.

TPP
Key Takeaway

When you raise and face a re raise preflop, you must respond with a structured plan, fold the hands that realize poorly, call with hands that can consistently realize equity, and 4 bet with a mix of value and blocker based bluffs. Let position, who is left to act, and sizing drive your choices, and stop making “set mine” or “I do not want to be pushed around” decisions. Your continue range is a profit engine, build it deliberately.

Let's Test Your Edge

Question 1: When you open and face a 3-bet, what are the three response options you must assign hands into?

Answer: Fold, call, or 4-bet.

Explanation: The article frames preflop EV as correctly sorting hands into these three buckets versus a 3-bet.

Question 2: According to the article, why can you generally call wider versus a 3-bet when you are in position?

Answer: Because you realize more equity in position.

Explanation: Position improves postflop playability and equity realization, allowing wider continues compared to being out of position.

Question 3: What is the “most ignored variable” the article highlights when deciding how to respond to a 3-bet?

Answer: Who is left to act.

Explanation: The players behind you affect squeeze risk and how capped your range becomes, which influences whether calling or 4-betting is higher EV.

Question 4: In the sizing examples given, if you open to 2.5x in position, what 3-bet size is shown as a standard in-position 3-bet?

Answer: 7.5x (3x the open).

Explanation: The article gives the example “open 2.5x, 3-bet to 7.5x” to illustrate typical in-position 3-bet sizing.

Question 5: In the Blind Pressure Test hand, after SB c-bets small on K♠9♦6♣ and BTN raises, what line does the article say is often the cleanest choice versus a thinking reg?

Answer: Call.

Explanation: With an open-ended straight draw, folding is rejected; calling keeps bluffs in and realizes equity, while shoving is framed as more opponent-dependent.

Found this article helpful? Share it with fellow players!

Join Our Academy

Join our academy and get private lessons, daily poker tips, strategies, and exclusive hand analysis delivered to your inbox before everyone.

Ready to Play Online?

Don’t grind empty-handed. Grab your 100% Welcome Bonus and start your journey at our #1 recommended poker room. Safe, secure, and full of action.

MASTER THE GAME.
JOIN TPP ACADEMY

Join our academy and get private lessons, daily poker tips, strategies, and exclusive hand analysis delivered to your inbox before everyone.

This website uses cookies to enhance user experience, analyze traffic, personalize content, and deliver targeted advertisements. By continuing to browse, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. If you do not agree with these terms, please do not use this website.